argue both sides of any issue
refuse to answer questions
that could deny confirmation
like his position regarding torture
while Bush apologists echo:
“legislate from the bench”
when it’s a matter of legislation
that is unconstitutional
it is their sworn duty to uphold,
constitutional changes by law
must be ratified
“look to foreign laws”
heaven forbid we allow any other country
be more enlightened
“integrity”
There is no integrity refusing to answer questions
we the people have the right to know.
There is no integrity concealing recent writings
of John Roberts…the old old ones being easier
to hop and skip.
Brilliance nor knowledge of current laws
describe integrity or insures wisdom.